Get the full breakdown of family office costs, fee models, and cost-saving strategies. Clear, data-driven insights for UHNW families and advisors.
Nov 05, 2025
Family offices
Running a family office involves more than balancing portfolios or coordinating advisors. It’s about building an organization that protects wealth, enables decision-making, and supports long-term ambitions. The challenge is that few families know what it truly costs – or how to measure whether those costs create value.
This guide outlines what drives expenses, how to structure fees transparently, and what strategies leading families use to reduce costs without compromising control.
Family office costs vary widely – but most fall between 30 and 120 basis points of assets under management, depending on size, service level, and location. A lean setup with basic administration may cost under $500,000 annually, while a fully staffed office with broad capabilities often exceeds $10 million.
Personnel remains the single largest expense, accounting for 60–70% of operating costs. Offices in high-cost jurisdictions or those with in-house investment teams, legal experts, or philanthropic staff can expect materially higher annual budgets.
Cost is also shaped by the complexity of the family’s wealth. Direct investments, cross-border holdings, and succession planning require deeper expertise – and more resources. Families with over $500 million in AUM typically benefit from economies of scale, driving down their relative cost base.
The important question is not only what it costs – but what it should cost based on your objectives, structure, and expectations.
Understanding what drives your family office costs is the first step to managing them effectively. These are the five categories that consistently account for the majority of expenses:
Salaries, bonuses, and benefits for key roles – including CEOs, CIOs, legal counsel, and administrative staff – typically represent the largest share of the budget. According to UBS (2025), staff costs average 67% of total operating expenses in family offices.
Offices that manage portfolios internally incur costs for research, execution, and oversight. Those that outsource pay management fees, often on an AUM basis. The industry average is 50 basis points of liquid assets under management.
Modern family offices rely on technology for reporting, compliance, communication, and data security. Cloud-based platforms can reduce manual workload, but setup and integration costs vary. Cybersecurity spend is rising across the sector due to increased risk exposure.
Modern family office software like Aleta’s next-gen wealth platform can bring all types of assets into one complete wealth overview and bridge generations by providing a seamless experience for every family member.
Regulatory requirements, cross-border tax structures, and estate planning demand specialist input. These services are often outsourced and billed either by the hour or project, making them difficult to predict without transparent agreements.
Day-to-day operations – including office rent, travel coordination, lifestyle management, and accounting – make up the remainder. Scope and service level differ significantly between lean and full-service models.
The way a family office charges – or tracks – its costs has as much impact as the total amount. While some structures are straightforward, others can introduce misalignment or complexity. Here are the most common models used today:
A percentage of assets under management, typically between 50–100 basis points. This model is easy to calculate but may not reflect the true cost of services, especially for offices with passive investment strategies or high levels of outsourcing.
A set amount paid regardless of portfolio size. Offers predictability and works well for offices with stable service levels and lower asset volatility. However, costs can become misaligned if complexity increases over time.
An additional charge linked to investment returns, often layered on top of a base fee. Encourages alignment but may incentivize excessive risk-taking if not structured carefully.
Combines fixed and variable components to match predictable services with variable needs, such as project work or transactional support. This is increasingly favored for bespoke arrangements.
Used primarily for legal, compliance, and specialist advisory work. Offers transparency if scoped correctly – but can result in cost creep without regular review.
Choosing the right model depends on your office’s structure, service intensity, and oversight capacity. The key is to make costs visible, measurable, and tied to actual value delivered.
Not every family needs a fully staffed office with 20 employees and multiple in-house teams. Many are now choosing a leaner family office structures that delivers the same strategic outcomes – at a fraction of the cost.
A core team of 2–4 professionals can oversee operations while outsourcing investment management, legal, and tax functions. According to J.P. Morgan (2024), some family offices with $50–500 million in assets operate efficiently on annual budgets under $1 million.
Technology platforms now allow for fully remote setups with centralized oversight and decentralized execution. These models often cut staffing and infrastructure costs by 40% or more, while maintaining service quality through trusted partners.
One European family with $150 million in diversified assets transitioned from a 12-person in-house office to a lean model with three key staff and outsourced partners. By leveraging digital reporting, cloud-based accounting, and on-demand legal counsel, they reduced fixed costs by 43% and improved oversight across all asset classes.
Efficiency doesn’t mean giving up control. It means designing an office structure that matches the family’s current needs while remaining scalable for future complexity.
Even the best-run family offices face cost overruns – not because of mismanagement, but due to overlooked or underestimated expenses. These hidden costs often remain buried in opaque invoices, fragmented systems, or legacy agreements.
Legal, tax, and accounting advisors often bill by the hour or on project basis. Without centralized oversight, families may pay overlapping or unnecessary fees across entities.
Investing in digital tools is only cost-effective if the tools are used fully. Many family offices license expensive platforms but fail to integrate them, relying instead on spreadsheets and manual workflows.
When multiple professionals cover overlapping tasks – especially in investment, reporting, or risk – costs rise without added value. Clear role design and accountability reduce this issue.
Without data, it's hard to know whether a cost is high, low, or appropriate. Few offices benchmark their spending against peer groups or cost ratios by AUM, complexity, or service scope.
Cost creep is rarely intentional – but over time, it can erode performance and reduce strategic flexibility. Building a transparent and actively managed cost framework is essential to prevent leakage.
Every family office incurs costs. The question is whether those costs deliver measurable value – not just in investment terms, but in overall outcomes for the family.
Efficient reporting, consolidated oversight, tax optimization, and coordinated succession planning can all create real financial value. For example, well-executed estate strategies can reduce tax leakage by millions over a generation.
A strong governance structure, timely decision-making, and reduced friction between stakeholders are often worth more than basis points saved. Offices that support education, philanthropy, and legacy tend to generate broader benefits across generations.
A family office managing $500 million with a cost ratio of 80 basis points spends $4 million per year. If that setup prevents a single litigation case, optimizes portfolio returns by 20 basis points, or facilitates a successful generational transition, the return may far exceed the cost.
The point is not to minimize cost at all costs – but to ensure that every dollar spent supports the family’s long-term strategy and values.
Most families review investment performance quarterly – but rarely apply the same discipline to operating costs. Yet costs compound just like returns. Periodic reviews and honest diagnostics can reveal inefficiencies that were previously hidden.
1. Do we know our total annual cost – including all external partners?
2. Are we paying for services we no longer use or need?
3. Do we have a clear view of what each function costs us, and why?
Offices that lack transparency risk strategic drift. In contrast, those with clear oversight often unlock cost savings, improve decision-making, and align spending with the family’s evolving priorities.
With more outsourced relationships, complex investments, and cross-border structures, cost visibility is no longer optional. It’s a requirement for informed governance – and a foundation for long-term resilience.

Discover why open architecture is the future of wealth reporting. Learn how Aleta’s API future-proofs family offices with flexible, accurate data access.
Nov 26, 2025
Family offices

Forbes spotlights Aleta in Simple’s 2025 tech report for its leadership in data consolidation and wealth reporting for family offices.
Nov 20, 2025
Family offices,
Aleta news

Discover how Aleta’s Data Cube enables financial data power users to explore their wealth in greater depth with live connections to Power BI and Excel or any other BI tool.
Nov 11, 2025
Family offices
A next-generation wealth platform for forward-thinking family offices
335 Madison Avenue, NY-10017, USA Ingerslevs Boulevard 3, 8000 Aarhus, DK CVR: 43 67 16 85